[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546B04E2.80000@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:35:46 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] fs-eventpoll: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the
function call "__pm_stay_awake"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:27:16 +0100
The __pm_stay_awake() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 7bcfff9..eec2e85 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -555,8 +555,7 @@ static inline void ep_pm_stay_awake(struct epitem *epi)
{
struct wakeup_source *ws = ep_wakeup_source(epi);
- if (ws)
- __pm_stay_awake(ws);
+ __pm_stay_awake(ws);
}
static inline bool ep_has_wakeup_source(struct epitem *epi)
@@ -571,8 +570,7 @@ static inline void ep_pm_stay_awake_rcu(struct epitem *epi)
rcu_read_lock();
ws = rcu_dereference(epi->ws);
- if (ws)
- __pm_stay_awake(ws);
+ __pm_stay_awake(ws);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists