[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546B0D08.2070305@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:10:32 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...marydata.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, osd-dev@...n-osd.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] exofs: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function
call "ore_put_io_state"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:05:19 +0100
The ore_put_io_state() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
index 84529b8..5dc7c4c 100644
--- a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
+++ b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
@@ -716,6 +716,5 @@ void _ore_free_raid_stuff(struct ore_io_state *ios)
if (ios->extra_part_alloc)
kfree(ios->per_dev[0].sglist);
}
- if (ios->ios_read_4_write)
- ore_put_io_state(ios->ios_read_4_write);
+ ore_put_io_state(ios->ios_read_4_write);
}
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists