[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <546B0DBB.7080000@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:13:31 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...marydata.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, osd-dev@...n-osd.org
CC: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/1] exofs: Deletion of an unnecessary check
before the function call "ore_put_io_state"
On 11/18/2014 11:10 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:05:19 +0100
>
> The ore_put_io_state() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
> index 84529b8..5dc7c4c 100644
> --- a/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
> +++ b/fs/exofs/ore_raid.c
> @@ -716,6 +716,5 @@ void _ore_free_raid_stuff(struct ore_io_state *ios)
> if (ios->extra_part_alloc)
> kfree(ios->per_dev[0].sglist);
> }
> - if (ios->ios_read_4_write)
> - ore_put_io_state(ios->ios_read_4_write);
> + ore_put_io_state(ios->ios_read_4_write);
> }
>
Thanks will submit for next Kernel
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists