[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141119143259.GC4029@saruman>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:32:59 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Julien CHAUVEAU <julien.chauveau@...-technologies.fr>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/tilcdc: add missing clk_put in tilcdc_unload()
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:13:20PM +0100, Julien CHAUVEAU wrote:
> We need to call clk_put on display clock, in the same way as functional clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien CHAUVEAU <julien.chauveau@...-technologies.fr>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c
> index 79a34cb..ccc1cdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_drv.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,9 @@ static int tilcdc_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
> CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
> #endif
>
> + if (priv->disp_clk)
> + clk_put(priv->disp_clk);
> +
> if (priv->clk)
> clk_put(priv->clk);
we should actually remove the priv->$clk check. clk_put() is safe
against NULL pointers.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists