linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix IO address calculation with Multi-Fintek PCI-to-UART Product

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141119184739.GA28871@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:47:39 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Peter Hung <hpeter@...il.com>
Cc:	jslaby@...e.cz, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix IO address calculation with Multi-Fintek PCI-to-UART
 Product

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:42:36PM +0800, Peter Hung wrote:
> Dear Greg KH and Senior Linuxers,
> 
> I had some some question, If I submited a patch, but it had rejected, how
> should I do when fix the patch?
> 
> 1. send patch by reply original email ?

You can do this, with a [PATCH v2] in the subject.

> 2. direct send patch with new email again?

That works as well, but tell us what changed from the first one please.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/