[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141119204427.GB30994@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:44:27 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: pagupta@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, dgibson@...hat.com,
vfalico@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
hkchu@...gle.com, wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...allels.com,
therbert@...gle.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com, xii@...gle.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:16:28PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:52:54 +0530
>
> > - Accept maximum number of queues as sysctl param so that any user space
> > application like libvirt can use this value to limit number of queues. Also
> > Administrators can specify maximum number of queues by updating this sysctl
> > entry.
>
> This is the only part I don't like.
>
> Just let whoever has privileges to configure the tun device shoot
> themselves in the foot if they want to by configuring "too many"
> queues.
>
> If the virtual entity runs itself out of resources by doing something
> stupid, it's purely their problem.
Well it will run host out of kernel, no?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists