[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1416566627.6958.16.camel@x220>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:43:47 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@...e.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: arm: pxa: CPU_PXA27x?
Robert,
Your commit 03ec7fe70c5c ("arm: pxa: add pxa27x device-tree support") is
included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141121). It adds a select
statement for CPU_PXA27x. But there's no Kconfig symbol CPU_PXA27x.
Why is that select needed? For what it's worth: __cpu_is_pxa27x()
compiles to something interesting if CONFIG_PXA27x is defined.
In https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/30/578 I proposed a patch that emits a
warning in cases like this. Like _all_ Kconfig related patches I've seen
flying by lately it appears to be dropped in /dev/null. What's going on?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists