linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / devfreq: tegra: add devfreq driver for Tegra Activity Monitor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <12372901.124221416906419323.JavaMail.weblogic@epmlwas08c>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:07:03 +0000 (GMT)
From:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc:	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	박경민 <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / devfreq: tegra: add devfreq driver for
 Tegra Activity Monitor

> On 25 November 2014 at 08:07, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com> wrote:
> >> The ACTMON block can monitor several counters, providing averaging and firing
> >> interrupts based on watermarking configuration. This implementation monitors
> >> the MCALL and MCCPU counters to choose an appropriate frequency for the
> >> external memory clock.
> >>
> >> This patch is based on work by Alex Frid <afrid@...dia.com> and Mikko
> >> Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
> >
> > How are you going to integrate other two patches?
> 
> I think they should go through the Tegra tree.
> 
> > May I just go ahead with this patch only?
> 
> Yes, I think that would be fine as the other patches aren't actual
> build or runtime dependencies. This driver shouldn't cause problems
> either if it's ran without the EMC and CPUFreq patches (though won't
> be fully functional, of course).

Ok, then, as long as the other two patches (for DT support) get
ACKed (seems fairly straightforward as well) or Signed-off by
corresponding tree maintainers, I feel fine to
send this patch along with the next pull request.

Thank you.

Cheers,
MyungJoo

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> > Cheers,
> > MyungJoo.
> >
>