lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141125131351.GC7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:13:51 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: Remove 'const' from the device_node pointers

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:14:48PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> As Russell King's explained it, there should not be pointers to
> struct device_node:
> 
> "struct device_node is a ref-counted structure.  That means if you
>  store a reference to it, you should "get" it, and you should "put"
>  it once you've done.  The act of "put"ing the pointed-to structure
>  involves writing to that structure, so it is totally unappropriate
>  to store a device_node structure as a const pointer.  It forces you
>  to have to cast it back to a non-const pointer at various points
>  in time to use various OF function calls."

So, we're not holding references here (we're just doing comparisons, the
references need to be owned before we get into the core) and I'm not
seeing anything here removing casts?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ