linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] Add kernel address sanitizer infrastructure.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <54748F4A.8030003@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:16:42 +0300
From:	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
To:	Dmitry Chernenkov <dmitryc@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Konstantin Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <adech.fo@...il.com>,
	Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@...il.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] Add kernel address sanitizer infrastructure.

On 11/25/2014 03:40 PM, Dmitry Chernenkov wrote:
> I'm a little concerned with how enabling/disabling works. If an
> enable() is forgotten once, it's disabled forever. If disable() is
> forgotten once, the toggle is reversed for the forseable future. MB
> check for inequality in kasan_enabled()? like current->kasan_depth >=
> 0 (will need a signed int for the field). Do you think it's going to
> decrease performance?

I think that check in kasan_enabled shouldn't hurt much.
But it also doesn't look very useful for me.

There are only few user of kasan_disable_local/kasan_enable_local, it's easy to review them.
And in future we also shouldn't have a lot of new users of those functions.

> 
> LGTM
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/