linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:46:03 +0100
From:	Pieter Smith <pieter@...sman.nl>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] fs/fuse: support compiling out splice

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:49:16PM -0800, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:42:42PM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 03:17:13PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > [Trimming CC.  Please do the same for other patches.  I for one am not
> > > interested in the general tinification discussion]
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:19:39AM +0100, Pieter Smith wrote:
> > > > To implement splice support, fs/fuse makes use of nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This
> > > > struct is exported by fs/splice. The goal of the larger patch set is to
> > > > completely compile out fs/splice, so uses of the exported struct need to be
> > > > compiled out along with fs/splice.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch therefore compiles out splice support in fs/fuse when
> > > > CONFIG_SYSCALL_SPLICE is undefined.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Smith <pieter@...sman.nl>
> > > > ---
> > > >  fs/fuse/dev.c | 9 +++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > index ca88731..e984302 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > > > @@ -1191,8 +1191,9 @@ __releases(fc->lock)
> > > >   * request_end().  Otherwise add it to the processing list, and set
> > > >   * the 'sent' flag.
> > > >   */
> > > > -static ssize_t fuse_dev_do_read(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct file *file,
> > > > -				struct fuse_copy_state *cs, size_t nbytes)
> > > > +static ssize_t __maybe_unused
> > > > +fuse_dev_do_read(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct file *file,
> > > > +		 struct fuse_copy_state *cs, size_t nbytes)
> > > 
> > > fuse_dev_do_read() is definitely going to remain used.  So no point in adding
> > > __maybe_unused.
> > 
> > Off course, but at least gcc now also is aware that this is intentional and
> > nicely refrains from nagging you with a warning.
> 
> GCC shouldn't be warning about an unused fuse_dev_do_read; please
> recheck.  It will always get used by fuse_dev_read, which
> unconditionally gets used in the .aio_read field of fuse_dev_operations.
> 
> - Josh Triplett

Thanks for pointing this out. I was too hasty in my response.

- Pieter Smith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/