[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141126144933.GA5630@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:49:34 +0100
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
nick <xerofoify@...il.com>, gleb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another Obsolete Fix me in trace.h?
2014-11-26 09:15-0500, Steven Rostedt:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:40:26 +0100
> Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:
> > The kernel part is trivial.
> > Most of the code is going to be in tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c.
> >
> > I wasn't sure whether to
> > 1) define new 'enum print_arg_type' for our function and do exactly what
> > other __print* did
> > 2) extend existing PRINT_FUNC with variable arguments and register it as
> > a "global" event handler
> >
> > as (2) makes more sense to me, but we already had it when some __print*
> > was implemented ... (and I didn't want to dig too deep into the project)
>
> Add a new hardcoded instance. The PRINT_FUNC is for plugins that have a
> unique function for the events they handle. Notice that event-parse
> does not define any func handlers. If this is to be generic, then lets
> make it specified as a new enum.
Ok, thanks.
(It just seemed weird that we have an infrastructure that could allow a
"generic plugin" to cover this functionality.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists