[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54751A95.60805@nod.at>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:11:01 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, pebolle@...cali.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_FHANDLE
Am 26.11.2014 um 00:51 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:36:52AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> systemd has a hard dependency on CONFIG_FHANDLE.
>
> It's been this way for a very long time, why is this suddenly an issue?
Because nobody cared to create patch and just called systemd names? ;-)
> And what about all of the other systemd kernel requirements, are you
> ignoring them here?
No, they are already enabled in x86 defconfig.
>> If you run systemd with CONFIG_FHANDLE=n it will somehow
>> boot but fail to spawn a getty or other basic services.
>> As systemd is now used by most x86 distributions it
>> makes sense to enabled this by default and save kernel
>> hackers a lot of value debugging time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig | 1 +
>> arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 1 +
>
> Do these files even make any sense anymore? Who uses them? The distros
> sure do not...
Maybe I'm oldschool but I expect a defconfig kernel to be able to boot a
recent distro.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists