linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] omap: i2c: don't check bus state IP rev3.3 and earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:33:41 -0800
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To:	Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] omap: i2c: don't check bus state IP rev3.3 and earlier

Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com> writes:

> 25 нояб. 2014 г., в 22:13, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org> написал(а):
>
>> I'll test your patch on all my OMAP boards.  Put whatever debug output
>> you want, and I'll send you links to all the boot output.
>
> Hello, Kevin!
>
> I've sent the patch[1]. Could you be so kind to run it on all your OMAP boards?
> Thank you very much!
> It is not urgent at all.

Done.  Built for omap2plus_defconfig, boot reports for all my OMAP
boards here: 
http://people.linaro.org/~khilman/tmp/next-20141126-1-g760388ee02e4/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/

> What is the preferred way for giving patches for you (for future)?

Email is fine.  I have things fully automated for primary upstream trees
(mainline, linux-next, stable, etc.) but for stuff like this, I can
trigger one-off tests.

However, if Tony wants to have a branch (besides the one already goes to
linux-next) which I would add to the automation cycle, I'm willing to do that.

> I have one more fixes for i2c-omap (I think final).
> I don't want to break tests anymore.
>
> And I found, that n900 boot test PASS, but in fact it doesn't[2].
> [2] http://status.armcloud.us/boot/omap3-n900/job/next/kernel/next-20141124/defconfig/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/

Right.  For these boot tests, PASS means it got to a userspace shell,
which it did.  The kernel got some warnings etc. during boot, but it
still booted up to a shell.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/