linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid BB-bit values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Nov 2014 01:30:03 +0300
From:	Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid BB-bit values

Hello, Tony!

24.11.2014 22:47, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> *:

> If you post a patch, I can test boot with it. Looks like the failing
> ones have i2c rev3.3 on 34xx vs rev4.4 on 36xx.

> So I doubt we just want to change the test for for a higher rev number
> for  OMAP_I2C_REV_ON_3430_3530.

You 100% right here.

Functional mode bits are unimplemented in the SYSTEST register on omap3530.
"10:5 Reserved Write 0s for future compatibility. Read returns 0."
That was the reason.

My fault.
Thank you for giving right directions.
Thanks Kevin for running test, so I could debug the reason.

Regards,
Alexander.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/