[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5476C8C5.4010202@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:46:29 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"dsaxena@...aro.org" <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
"arndb@...db.de" <arndb@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/6] arm64: ptrace: allow tracer to skip a system call
On 11/26/2014 10:02 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:49:47AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> If tracer modifies a syscall number to -1, this traced system call should
>> be skipped with a return value specified in x0.
>> This patch implements this semantics.
>>
>> Please note:
>> * syscall entry tracing and syscall exit tracing (ftrace tracepoint and
>> audit) are always executed, if enabled, even when skipping a system call
>> (that is, -1).
>> In this way, we can avoid a potential bug where audit_syscall_entry()
>> might be called without audit_syscall_exit() at the previous system call
>> being called, that would cause OOPs in audit_syscall_entry().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
>> index 726b910..946ec52 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
>> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
>> */
>> sc_nr .req x25 // number of system calls
>> scno .req x26 // syscall number
>> +scno_w .req w26 // syscall number (lower 32 bits)
>> stbl .req x27 // syscall table pointer
>> tsk .req x28 // current thread_info
>>
>> @@ -668,8 +669,14 @@ ENDPROC(el0_svc)
>> * switches, and waiting for our parent to respond.
>> */
>> __sys_trace:
>> - mov x0, sp
>> + cmp scno_w, #-1 // set default errno for
>
> I hate that we have to use scno_w, but the only alternative I can think of
> is using w8 directly, which isn't any better and doesn't work for compat.
> Ho-hum, I guess we'll stick with what you have.
The possible approaches might be:
* use 32-bit registers for scno & sc_nr and use "sxtw scno, w8," or
* use an extra reg like
__sys_trace:
mov x0, #0xffffffff
cmp scno, x0
b.ne 1f
>> + b.ne 1f // user-issued syscall(-1)
>> + mov x0, #-ENOSYS
>> + str x0, [sp]
>
> Can you use #S_X0 here for clarity, please?
Okey.
>> +1: mov x0, sp
>> bl syscall_trace_enter
>> + cmp w0, #-1 // skip the syscall?
>> + b.eq __sys_trace_return_skipped
>> adr lr, __sys_trace_return // return address
>> uxtw scno, w0 // syscall number (possibly new)
>> mov x1, sp // pointer to regs
>> @@ -684,6 +691,7 @@ __sys_trace:
>>
>> __sys_trace_return:
>> str x0, [sp] // save returned x0
>
> and update this guy too.
Sure.
-Takahiro AKASHI
> Will
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists