[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpcHawZ8F+2QdDYO=+qbh=uQb+A+2Rq_M7g9VqMnFtM1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:34:03 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in
core code
[...]
> That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good
> question. In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that
> don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form. However, it
> may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough,
> because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special
> support. We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that
> gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a
> broad consensus on that.
That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans.
Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well.
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists