lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 01:50:12 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code On Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:34:03 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > [...] > > > That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good > > question. In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that > > don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form. However, it > > may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough, > > because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special > > support. We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that > > gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a > > broad consensus on that. > > That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans. > > Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well. I'll do that, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists