[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141128192805.GA3669@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 20:28:05 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] oom && coredump
On 11/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 11/27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So I think the patch below makes sense anyway. Although I should probably
> > split it and remove PT_TRACE_EXIT in 2/2.
>
> So let me send the patches.
>
> David, Michal, could you review and ack/nack these changes explicitly?
>
> Let me repeat once again that this patch doesn't pretend to solve
> all problems, even with the coredumping. And I have to admit that
> my main motivation is 2/2, this PT_TRACE_EXIT check annoys me ;)
Another simple test. cat mtsleep.c:
#include <unistd.h>
#include <pthread.h>
void *tfunc(void *arg)
{
pause();
return NULL;
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t th;
pthread_create(&th, NULL, tfunc, NULL);
pause();
return 0;
}
Now,
# echo '|/bin/sleep 1000' >> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
# echo 10 >> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pipe_limit
# ./mtsleep &
# kill -QUIT %1
# perl -e 'push @_,"x" x 1000_1000 while 1'
Before this series the system hangs and doesn't respond. With these
patches it correctly kills perl.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists