[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141202091947.GB27014@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:19:47 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] oom: don't assume that a coredumping thread will
exit soon
On Fri 28-11-14 00:04:05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> oom_kill.c assumes that PF_EXITING task should exit and free the memory
> soon. This is wrong in many ways and one important case is the coredump.
> A task can sleep in exit_mm() "forever" while the coredumping sub-thread
> can need more memory.
>
> Change the PF_EXITING checks to take SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP into account,
> we add the new trivial helper for that.
>
> Note: this is only the first step, this patch doesn't try to solve other
> problems. For example it doesn't try to clear the wrongly set TIF_MEMDIE
> (SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check is obviously racy),
I am not sure I understand this. What do you mean by wrongly set
TIF_MEMDIE? That we give a process access to reserves even though it is
already done with the coredumping?
> fatal_signal_pending() can be false positive, etc.
When can this happen?
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
I guess the patch as is makes sense and it is an improvement. We need
to call the helper in mem_cgroup_out_of_memory as well, though.
With that feel free to add
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Also the original fix for the coredumping (edd45544c6f0 "oom: avoid
deferring oom killer if exiting task is being traced") doesn't work
really as per http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141711049013620 then
this and the follow up patch should be marked for stable I guess.
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 5340f6b..7af33b5 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,12 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> }
> #endif
>
> +static inline bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return (task->flags & PF_EXITING) &&
> + !(task->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP);
> +}
> +
> enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct task_struct *task,
> unsigned long totalpages, const nodemask_t *nodemask,
> bool force_kill)
> @@ -281,7 +287,7 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct task_struct *task,
> if (oom_task_origin(task))
> return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
>
> - if (task->flags & PF_EXITING && !force_kill) {
> + if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !force_kill) {
> /*
> * If this task is not being ptraced on exit, then wait for it
> * to finish before killing some other task unnecessarily.
> @@ -443,7 +449,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
> */
> - if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> + if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
> set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
> put_task_struct(p);
> return;
> @@ -649,7 +655,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * select it. The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
> * quickly exit and free its memory.
> */
> - if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || current->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || task_will_free_mem(current)) {
> set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE);
> return;
> }
> --
> 1.5.5.1
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists