[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417311913.7215.111.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 01:45:13 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@...fifty.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
Linux NICS <linux.nics@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
> this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
> weekend here in the US.
[...]
If there were double register reads being replaced with single register
reads, I'd agree this was likely to introduce a regression. But all I
see is var = er32(REG) being changed to er32(REG).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The world is coming to an end. Please log off.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists