[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141201045446.GA3277@sudip-PC>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:24:46 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@...fifty.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
Linux NICS <linux.nics@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
> > this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
> > weekend here in the US.
> [...]
>
> If there were double register reads being replaced with single register
> reads, I'd agree this was likely to introduce a regression. But all I
> see is var = er32(REG) being changed to er32(REG).
no, double register reads are not modified. only the unused variables are removed.
thanks
sudip
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> The world is coming to an end. Please log off.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists