linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: dts: mt8135: Add support for MT6397 regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:16:12 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Sandeep Nair <sandeep_n@...com>,
	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
	Dongdong Cheng <dongdong.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: dts: mt8135: Add support for MT6397 regulator

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:19:25AM +0800, Flora Fu wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 15:30 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: 

> > This appears to be the DT fragment for a SoC but you are defining the
> > system integration for the PMIC.  That's bad, the PMIC is a separate
> > device so should be hooked up by the board using it.  If there's common
> > elements from a reference design they should be in their own .dtsi.

> Do you mean that we should add a mt6397.dtsi and include it from
> mt8135.dtsi? For board specific, update them in mt8135.dtsi? 

More likely you should just add any integration needed in the board
file.  There should be no need to specify anything generically for the
regulators on a PMIC except registering the device.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)