linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <547CF650.4070907@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:14:24 +0100
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
CC:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>,
	Ola Jeppson <ola@...pteva.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree

Am 01.12.2014 um 23:56 schrieb Sören Brinkmann:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 01:24PM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 09:26PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 01.12.2014 um 19:42 schrieb Soren Brinkmann:
>>>> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts   | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>  4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
>>>> index ce2ef5bec4f2..9ed60938f301 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> [...]
>>>> @@ -324,6 +344,6 @@
>>>>  			reg = <0xf8005000 0x1000>;
>>>>  			reset = <0>;
>>>>  			timeout-sec = <10>;
>>>> -		};
>>>> +		} ;
>>>>  	};
>>>>  };
>>>
>>> Unrelated accidental change here though. :)
> 
> Since a v2 is needed now, does this really require a dedicated patch to
> fix this bogus space here or do we just look the other way?

Sorry, I don't understand the question: If as you say a v2 is needed,
why knowingly introduce a space between } and ; in your patch? Maybe I'm
missing something or you're looking at the patch in reverse...?

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/