lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec924523a1e047b59d13a7da868430be@BN1AFFO11FD015.protection.gbl>
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:16:13 -0800
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
CC:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>,
	Ola Jeppson <ola@...pteva.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree

On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:14AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 01.12.2014 um 23:56 schrieb Sören Brinkmann:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 01:24PM -0800, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 09:26PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >>> Am 01.12.2014 um 19:42 schrieb Soren Brinkmann:
> >>>> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++
> >>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts   | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>>  4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> >>>> index ce2ef5bec4f2..9ed60938f301 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> > [...]
> >>>> @@ -324,6 +344,6 @@
> >>>>  			reg = <0xf8005000 0x1000>;
> >>>>  			reset = <0>;
> >>>>  			timeout-sec = <10>;
> >>>> -		};
> >>>> +		} ;
> >>>>  	};
> >>>>  };
> >>>
> >>> Unrelated accidental change here though. :)
> > 
> > Since a v2 is needed now, does this really require a dedicated patch to
> > fix this bogus space here or do we just look the other way?
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand the question: If as you say a v2 is needed,
> why knowingly introduce a space between } and ; in your patch? Maybe I'm
> missing something or you're looking at the patch in reverse...?

Oh, I thought I was removing it... That must have been some merge error.
Forget what I said. This part will vanish.

	Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ