[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203001408.GB21569@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:14:08 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: dborkman@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] wusb: replace memset by memzero_explicit
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 05:59:34PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> Memset on a local variable may be removed when it is called just before the
> variable goes out of scope. Using memzero_explicit defeats this
> optimization. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this
> change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> identifier x;
> type T;
> @@
>
> {
> ... when any
> T x[...];
> ... when any
> when exists
> - memset
> + memzero_explicit
> (x,
> -0,
> ...)
> ... when != x
> when strict
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> This change was suggested by Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> ---
> Daniel Borkmann suggested that these patches could go through Herbert Xu's
> cryptodev tree.
Why? There's no dependancy on anything in the cryptodev tree,
memzero_explicit is in Linus's tree now.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists