[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547E56E1.2080105@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:18:41 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] wusb: replace memset by memzero_explicit
On 12/03/2014 01:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 05:59:34PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>>
>> Memset on a local variable may be removed when it is called just before the
>> variable goes out of scope. Using memzero_explicit defeats this
>> optimization. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this
>> change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>>
>> // <smpl>
>> @@
>> identifier x;
>> type T;
>> @@
>>
>> {
>> ... when any
>> T x[...];
>> ... when any
>> when exists
>> - memset
>> + memzero_explicit
>> (x,
>> -0,
>> ...)
>> ... when != x
>> when strict
>> }
>> // </smpl>
>>
>> This change was suggested by Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>>
>> ---
>> Daniel Borkmann suggested that these patches could go through Herbert Xu's
>> cryptodev tree.
>
> Why? There's no dependancy on anything in the cryptodev tree,
> memzero_explicit is in Linus's tree now.
Sorry, I guess this was not really clear, that comment actually only
refers to the arch/*/crypto/ patches.
Anyway, thanks for queueing this up, Greg.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists