[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d281nntf.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:24:12 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c between commit b68362278af9
> ("drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns") from the
> drm-intel-fixes tree and commit a72e4c9f9a11 ("drm/i915: Use dev_priv
> in public intel_fifo_underrun.c functions") from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the drm tree version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
b68362278af9 removes two lines of code; these should be removed in the
resolved version too.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists