[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203192829.28bec60c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 19:28:29 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the
drm-intel-fixes tree
Hi Jani,
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:24:12 +0200 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c between commit b68362278af9
> > ("drm/i915: More cautious with pch fifo underruns") from the
> > drm-intel-fixes tree and commit a72e4c9f9a11 ("drm/i915: Use dev_priv
> > in public intel_fifo_underrun.c functions") from the drm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I used the drm tree version) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary (no action is required).
>
> b68362278af9 removes two lines of code; these should be removed in the
> resolved version too.
Thanks for the correction. I will do that tomorrow.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists