[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141203155242.GE6043@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:52:43 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LinuxPPC-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: Convert p[te|md]_numa users to
p[te|md]_protnone_numa
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:53:37PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:57 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> Now, hash_preload can possibly insert an hpte in hash page table even if
> >> the access is not allowed by the pte permissions. But i guess even that
> >> is ok. because we will fault again, end-up calling hash_page_mm where we
> >> handle that part correctly.
> >
> > I think we need a test case...
> >
>
> I ran the subpageprot test that Paul had written. I modified it to ran
> with selftest.
>
It's implied but can I assume it passed? If so, Ben and Paul, can I
consider the series to be acked by you other than the minor comment
updates?
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists