[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d280bqfw.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:50:35 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
LinuxPPC-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: Convert p[te|md]_numa users to p[te|md]_protnone_numa
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:53:37PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:57 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> >> Now, hash_preload can possibly insert an hpte in hash page table even if
>> >> the access is not allowed by the pte permissions. But i guess even that
>> >> is ok. because we will fault again, end-up calling hash_page_mm where we
>> >> handle that part correctly.
>> >
>> > I think we need a test case...
>> >
>>
>> I ran the subpageprot test that Paul had written. I modified it to ran
>> with selftest.
>>
>
> It's implied but can I assume it passed?
Yes.
-bash-4.2# ./subpage_prot
test: subpage_prot
tags: git_version:v3.17-rc3-13511-g0cd3756
allocated malloc block of 0x4000000 bytes at 0x0x3fffb0d10000
testing malloc block...
OK
success: subpage_prot
-bash-4.2#
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists