[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548024C7.3060004@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:09:27 +0200
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"plagnioj@...osoft.com" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com"
<alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] LS1021A: Add dcfb framebuffer driver support.
On 04/12/14 10:30, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com wrote:
> Sorry for confusing, it was delayed for other reasons internal.
>
> I am not familiar about the DRM, and I'd like to know if the DRM driver will be
> support, should I also develop the libdrm too ? Or just coding in kernel level ?
For simple drm drivers (this looks like it would be a simple one), I
don't think there's any need for libdrm support. The generic DRM
interfaces should be enough, so just kernel level coding needed.
> Is there any Document about how to have /dev/fbX device to use ?
There's DRM documentation here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/drm/index.html
And many existing drivers to use as examples. The dri-devel list
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel), which is the
mailing list used for DRM development, is active and you probably can
get more support from there than from the fbdev list.
It should not be a huge effort to write a drm driver for a simple LCD
controller like this. I would bet that you can write a working driver in
a week.
> If possible, I'd like this could be accept for this time. And I will add the DRM
> Version later(for developing and testing will take a long time).
I'm sorry but "it was delayed for internal reasons" and "our customer
needs this driver" are not very good reasons for getting a driver merged
to mainline Linux.
You can provide your driver to your customer as a separate patch series
which they can apply. There should be no conflicts or other issues
there, so it should be simple.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists