[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54802467.4000702@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:07:51 +0000
From: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>
To: rajeev kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ASoC: dwc: Don't allow negative use counts
On 12/04/14 06:43, rajeev kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:10 PM, rajeev kumar
> <rajeevkumar.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:38:55PM +0000, Andrew Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>>> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
>>>> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
>>>> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
>>>> - dev->active--;
>>>> + if (dev->active > 0)
>>>> + dev->active--;
>>>
>>> How is this triggering - this sounds like you're papering over some
>>> other bug somewhere?
>
> This check can be removed as it is not going to triggered.
As I said in my email to Mark, I couldn't convince myself that STOP/SUSPEND would only be called once so it seemed like a loophole which /might/ result in the device not functioning correctly.
If this can never happen, I'll drop the patch.
Andrew
> B'rgds
> ~Rajeev
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists