[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548022B3.8050105@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:00:35 +0000
From: Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajeev Kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ASoC: dwc: Don't allow negative use counts
On 12/03/14 17:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:38:55PM +0000, Andrew Jackson wrote:
>
>> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
>> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
>> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
>> - dev->active--;
>> + if (dev->active > 0)
>> + dev->active--;
>
> How is this triggering - this sounds like you're papering over some
> other bug somewhere?
>
When I looked at the code paths I couldn't convince myself that STOP wouldn't be called more than once. Then actuve would be negative and the device might not be restartable. I didn't have a problem per se, it was just that it seemed to be something of a loophole.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists