[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2090131.rL6S1lx8Ky@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:17:15 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Rajeev Kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: dwc: Add devicetree support for Designware I2S
On Thursday 04 December 2014 11:07:46 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 December 2014 20:19:05 Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Not all the world uses DT, this is a DesignWare IP so it's likely to get
> > > deployed widely - potentially on PCI cards and things like that.
>
> > It's not really new though, and we are only seeing the second user.
> > Maybe this one just isn't as common as a lot of the other designware IP?
>
> It's relatively common with newer companies - it's like UARTs, any
> company that's been around for a long time will have a homebrew IP
> already but places that don't (or get fed up with their existing IP)
> will tend to buy something in.
I see, but are any of the newer designs going to use platform_data?
My general feeling was that the only places that still depend on that
are legacy platforms and architectures.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists