[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141204113346.GT7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:33:46 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jackson <Andrew.Jackson@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Rajeev Kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: dwc: Add devicetree support for Designware I2S
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2014 11:07:46 Mark Brown wrote:
> > It's relatively common with newer companies - it's like UARTs, any
> > company that's been around for a long time will have a homebrew IP
> > already but places that don't (or get fed up with their existing IP)
> > will tend to buy something in.
> I see, but are any of the newer designs going to use platform_data?
> My general feeling was that the only places that still depend on that
> are legacy platforms and architectures.
And x86 which does have things like PCI cards.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists