lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201412042318.33889.PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Date:	Thu, 4 Dec 2014 23:18:33 +0100
From:	Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
To:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	josh.triplett@...el.com, christophe.ricard@...il.com,
	jason.gunthorpe@...idianresearch.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 8/8] tpm: TPM 2.0 FIFO Interface

Hi Jarkko,

Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 06:55:18 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
> From: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>
> 
> Detect TPM 2.0 by using the extended STS (STS3) register. For TPM 2.0,
> instead of calling tpm_get_timeouts(), assign duration and timeout
> values defined in the TPM 2.0 PTP specification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 80
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 67
> insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> index 89e1abb..71cbb2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 IBM Corporation
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Intel Corporation
>   *
>   * Authors:
>   * Leendert van Doorn <leendert@...son.ibm.com>
> @@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ enum tis_status {
>  	TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT = 0x08,
>  };
> 
> +enum tis_status3 {
> +	TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM = 0x04,
> +};
> +
>  enum tis_int_flags {
>  	TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE = 0x80000000,
>  	TPM_INTF_BURST_COUNT_STATIC = 0x100,
> @@ -70,6 +75,7 @@ enum tis_defaults {
>  #define	TPM_INT_STATUS(l)		(0x0010 | ((l) << 12))
>  #define	TPM_INTF_CAPS(l)		(0x0014 | ((l) << 12))
>  #define	TPM_STS(l)			(0x0018 | ((l) << 12))
> +#define	TPM_STS3(l)			(0x001b | ((l) << 12))
>  #define	TPM_DATA_FIFO(l)		(0x0024 | ((l) << 12))
> 
>  #define	TPM_DID_VID(l)			(0x0F00 | ((l) << 12))
> @@ -363,6 +369,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8
> *buf, size_t len) {
>  	int rc;
>  	u32 ordinal;
> +	unsigned long dur;
> 
>  	rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, buf, len);
>  	if (rc < 0)
> @@ -374,9 +381,14 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8
> *buf, size_t len)
> 
>  	if (chip->vendor.irq) {
>  		ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6)));
> +
> +		if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> +			dur = tpm2_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> +		else
> +			dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> +
>  		if (wait_for_tpm_stat
> -		    (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
> -		     tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal),
> +		    (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur,
>  		     &chip->vendor.read_queue, false) < 0) {
>  			rc = -ETIME;
>  			goto out_err;
> @@ -588,6 +600,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle
> acpi_dev_handle, int rc, i, irq_s, irq_e, probe;
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip;
>  	struct priv_data *priv;
> +	u8 sts3;
> 
>  	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct priv_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (priv == NULL)
> @@ -604,11 +617,28 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev,
> acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle, if (!chip->vendor.iobase)
>  		return -EIO;
> 
> +	sts3 = ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_STS3(1));
> +	if ((sts3 & TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM) == TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM)
> +		chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> +
>  	/* Default timeouts */
> -	chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> -	chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
> -	chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> -	chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> +	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_A);
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_B);
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_C);
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_D);
> +		chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
> +			usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_SHORT);
> +		chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
> +			usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM);
> +		chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG] =
> +			usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG);
> +	} else {
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> +		chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> +	}
> 
>  	if (wait_startup(chip, 0) != 0) {
>  		rc = -ENODEV;
> @@ -623,8 +653,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle
> acpi_dev_handle, vendor = ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_DID_VID(0));
>  	chip->vendor.manufacturer_id = vendor;
> 
> -	dev_info(dev,
> -		 "1.2 TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
> +	dev_info(dev, "%s TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
> +		 (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ? "2.0" : "1.2",
>  		 vendor >> 16, ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_RID(0)));
> 


When loading tpm_tis force=1 with my tpm1.2 chip on a machine without bios 
integration, it fets detected as a TPM2.0 chip :/

sudo rmmod tpm_tis
# modprobe tpm_tis force=1
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'tpm_tis': No such device
# dmesg 
[  263.903828] tpm_tis tpm_tis: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xB, rev-id 16)
[  263.948049] tpm_tis tpm_tis: A TPM error (10) occurred continue selftest
[  263.948120] tpm_tis tpm_tis: TPM self test failed


sts3 is reported as 0xff from my TPM1.2

Thanks,
Peter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ