| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201412042328.29578.PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 23:28:29 +0100
From: Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
To: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
christophe.ricard@...il.com, josh.triplett@...el.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>,
jason.gunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 8/8] tpm: TPM 2.0 FIFO Interface
Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 23:18:33 schrieb Peter Hüwe:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 06:55:18 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
> > From: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>
> >
> > Detect TPM 2.0 by using the extended STS (STS3) register. For TPM 2.0,
> > instead of calling tpm_get_timeouts(), assign duration and timeout
> > values defined in the TPM 2.0 PTP specification.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 80
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 67
> > insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> > index 89e1abb..71cbb2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 IBM Corporation
> >
> > + * Copyright (C) 2014 Intel Corporation
> >
> > *
> > * Authors:
> > * Leendert van Doorn <leendert@...son.ibm.com>
> >
> > @@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ enum tis_status {
> >
> > TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT = 0x08,
> >
> > };
> >
> > +enum tis_status3 {
> > + TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM = 0x04,
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > enum tis_int_flags {
> >
> > TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE = 0x80000000,
> > TPM_INTF_BURST_COUNT_STATIC = 0x100,
> >
> > @@ -70,6 +75,7 @@ enum tis_defaults {
> >
> > #define TPM_INT_STATUS(l) (0x0010 | ((l) << 12))
> > #define TPM_INTF_CAPS(l) (0x0014 | ((l) << 12))
> > #define TPM_STS(l) (0x0018 | ((l) << 12))
> >
> > +#define TPM_STS3(l) (0x001b | ((l) << 12))
> >
> > #define TPM_DATA_FIFO(l) (0x0024 | ((l) << 12))
> >
> > #define TPM_DID_VID(l) (0x0F00 | ((l) << 12))
> >
> > @@ -363,6 +369,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> > u8 *buf, size_t len) {
> >
> > int rc;
> > u32 ordinal;
> >
> > + unsigned long dur;
> >
> > rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, buf, len);
> > if (rc < 0)
> >
> > @@ -374,9 +381,14 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> > u8 *buf, size_t len)
> >
> > if (chip->vendor.irq) {
> >
> > ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6)));
> >
> > +
> > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > + dur = tpm2_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> > + else
> > + dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> > +
> >
> > if (wait_for_tpm_stat
> >
> > - (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
> > - tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal),
> > + (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur,
> >
> > &chip->vendor.read_queue, false) < 0) {
> >
> > rc = -ETIME;
> > goto out_err;
> >
> > @@ -588,6 +600,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev,
> > acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle, int rc, i, irq_s, irq_e, probe;
> >
> > struct tpm_chip *chip;
> > struct priv_data *priv;
> >
> > + u8 sts3;
> >
> > priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct priv_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (priv == NULL)
> >
> > @@ -604,11 +617,28 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev,
> > acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle, if (!chip->vendor.iobase)
> >
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > + sts3 = ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_STS3(1));
> > + if ((sts3 & TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM) == TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM)
> > + chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> > +
> >
> > /* Default timeouts */
> >
> > - chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> > - chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
> > - chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> > - chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_A);
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_B);
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_C);
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_D);
> > + chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
> > + usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_SHORT);
> > + chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
> > + usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM);
> > + chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG] =
> > + usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG);
> > + } else {
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> > + chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> > + }
> >
> > if (wait_startup(chip, 0) != 0) {
> >
> > rc = -ENODEV;
> >
> > @@ -623,8 +653,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev,
> > acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle, vendor = ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase +
> > TPM_DID_VID(0));
> >
> > chip->vendor.manufacturer_id = vendor;
> >
> > - dev_info(dev,
> > - "1.2 TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
> > + dev_info(dev, "%s TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
> > + (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ? "2.0" : "1.2",
> >
> > vendor >> 16, ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_RID(0)));
>
> When loading tpm_tis force=1 with my tpm1.2 chip on a machine without bios
> integration, it fets detected as a TPM2.0 chip :/
>
> sudo rmmod tpm_tis
> # modprobe tpm_tis force=1
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'tpm_tis': No such device
> # dmesg
> [ 263.903828] tpm_tis tpm_tis: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0xB, rev-id 16)
> [ 263.948049] tpm_tis tpm_tis: A TPM error (10) occurred continue selftest
> [ 263.948120] tpm_tis tpm_tis: TPM self test failed
>
>
> sts3 is reported as 0xff from my TPM1.2
>
Hmm,
my TPM2.0 chip also reports sts3 as 0xff (when loading with force=1 on a
machine without bios integration)
[ 307.095344] sts3 ff
[ 307.095366] tpm_tis tpm_tis: 2.0 TPM (device-id 0x1A, rev-id 16)
[ 307.140047] tpm_tis tpm_tis: A TPM error (256) occurred continue selftest
[ 307.140056] tpm_tis tpm_tis: TPM self test failed
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists