[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5480F057.9010203@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:37:59 +0100
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size
On 04.12.14 19:20, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:46:33PM +0000, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> With binutils 2.25 the default alignment for 32bit arm sections changed to
>> have everything 64k aligned. Armv7 binaries built with this binutils version
>> run successfully on an arm64 system.
>>
>> Since effectively there is now the chance to run armv7 code on arm64 even
>> with 64k page size, it doesn't make sense to block people from enabling
>> CONFIG_COMPAT on those configurations.
>
> Is there a distro available that is built with a recent enough binutils for
> this? I'd really like to run our regression tests to check that page-size
> assumptions don't exist for things like shm.
I don't have a full distribution for you yet, but we'll start to switch
to the 2.25 branch soon.
Michael, what are you plans on when a first armv7 Factory build based on
2.25 would be available?
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists