[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417736103.2721.24.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:35:03 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: bpf_jit_comp: Reduce is_ereg() code size
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 15:14 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 15:00 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Use the (1 << reg) & mask trick to reduce code size.
[]
> Really, the root cause of this is the 'inline' abuse in non fast paths
> for non trivial functions.
There is no object size change with is_ereg()
defined "static inline" or "static"
Curiously, if you mark it noinline, the size increases.
gcc 4.9.1, x86-64, -O2 no profiling support
$ size arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o.st*
text data bss dec hex filename
10679 4 0 10683 29bb arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o.static_inline
11535 4 0 11539 2d13 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o.static_noinline
10679 4 0 10683 29bb arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.o.static_without_inline
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists