[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417740382.22424.40.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 16:46:22 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: bpf_jit_comp: Reduce is_ereg() code size
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 15:31 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> well, it is a trivial function even from compiler point of view.
> Dropping inline keyword doesn't help. gcc still inlines them.
> Changing all 3 functions to _noinline_ doesn't help either.
> So I think this patch is actually quite helpful to reduce code size.
Well, again this might depend on CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
I guess people trying to get very small kernels are using this option.
My point was : If we care about code size, we should also remove these
inline keywords at the same time, to increase SNR of netdev/lkml lists.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists