[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208124917.GI16827@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:19:17 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
nsekhar@...com, arnd@...db.de, khilman@...prootsystems.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, chris@...ntf.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: edma: Split up header file to platform_data and
API file
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> include/linux/platform_data/ is not a correct place to keep the API
> definitions for edma, it is meant to be only for the pdata for the device.
> Clean up this by moving the API to include/linux/edma.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/edma.c | 3 +-
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h | 1 +
> drivers/dma/edma.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/edma.h | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/platform_data/edma.h | 148 ++--------------------------
> sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.h | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/edma.h
I was hoping that this will have delete for platform_data/edma.h, do we
still need that and why shouldn't we get rid of this :)
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists