[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141208141837.752a9968@frodo>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:18:37 +0100
From: Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: ioc4: fix variable may be used uninitialized
warning
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:42:47 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Monday 08 December 2014 13:27:20 Richard Leitner wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can tell 'start' cannot really be used uninitialized
> > here, but for the sanity of gcc output explicitly initialize it.
> > Same goes for the 'end' variable.
>
> Prabhakar Lad also sent a patch for this already, which was lacking
> a good patch description. Your patch does this slightly better but
> still fails to explain how you concluded it was safe and you don't
> really explain why you initialize the 'end' variable that we don't
> even get a warning about.
Oops, I'm sorry, I haven't seen the patch and the answers to it.
According to the comments by Andrew a simplification of this code
section would be nice. I think it should be possible to do this in a
way that the initialize-to-zero won't be needed anymore.
Prabhakar Lad, are you working on this already?
If not I'll take a look at it.
regards,
richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists