linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1418066039.2058.19.camel@x220>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:13:59 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Christoph Jaeger <cj@...ux.com>
Cc:	yann.morin.1998@...e.fr, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dborkman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias
 'boolean'

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 19:51 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> This doesn't apply on next-20141208. What tree did you base this on?

I got it to apply on next-20141208 by dropping the hunk for
arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/Kconfig and by making (trivial) context
changes to the hunks for init/Kconfig and net/Kconfig.

(My experience with actual maintainers is that they won't bother to do
that. Anyhow, Kconfig is basically unmaintained. And I don't know which
tree one should base ones Kconfig patches on.)

I'll muddle along...

Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/