linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5485F923.3090301@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:16:51 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	Christoph Jaeger <cj@...ux.com>, yann.morin.1998@...e.fr,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias
 'boolean'

On 12/08/2014 08:13 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 19:51 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> This doesn't apply on next-20141208. What tree did you base this on?
>
> I got it to apply on next-20141208 by dropping the hunk for
> arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/Kconfig and by making (trivial) context
> changes to the hunks for init/Kconfig and net/Kconfig.
>
> (My experience with actual maintainers is that they won't bother to do
> that. Anyhow, Kconfig is basically unmaintained. And I don't know which
> tree one should base ones Kconfig patches on.)

Well, I guess if in doubt then this could go into Andrew's tree. :)

> I'll muddle along...
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/