linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:33:33 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
	"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user)

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:27:12AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:22:06PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:11:04AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 09:27:08AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 04:18:56PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:51:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > > > > Em Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:49:52PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > > > > > > > Jiri Wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > looks ok to me..
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the review.
> > > > > > > > > > I'll test it once I get hands on Haswel server again, I guess we
> > > > > > > > > > wait for the kernel change to go in first anyway, right?
> > > > > > > > > I'm not sure, let's ask Peter.
> > > > > > > > > Peter?
> > > > > > > > Would be good to go in one pull request, so that whoever pulls it has
> > > > > > > > the chance to test the kernel feature with the accompanying tooling bits.
> > > > > > > also there's user part dependency on kernel.. soem new define IIRC
> > > > > > Oh, right. We have to let them go in together.
> > > > > The ones that are just prep patches I am merging now, Jiri, can I stick
> > > > > an Acked-by to the non-LBR related ones?
> > >  
> > > > I guess u mean just this one? 
> > > > 2803   T Dec 02 kan.liang@...el (3.4K) ├─>[PATCH V5 2/3] perf tool: Move cpumode resolve code to add_callchain_ip
> > > 
> > > There is another I split from, iirc 1/3, that is unrelated to that
> > > patch, fixing '-g fp' usage that became invalid after a patch from you:
> > > 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=f70b4e39de4ef25aade966c0dfc69cfb97091be9
> > 
> > this onliner is ok, but I dont recall seeing this change separated..
> 
> I did the separation here, I thought I could have your ack there as you
> said you was ok with the whole patchkit, no?
>  
> > and its 'Link' points to the whole 1/3 patch, which seems weird
> > 
> > what do I miss?
> 
> Well, that is why I added the comment just before my S-o-B :-) We could
> have gone thru the whole process of me submitting a patchkit so that we
> could have a proper Link:, but I thought it was too straightforward to
> warrant that :-\

ah ok.. u can keep the ack on the onliner of course

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/