[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141211102622.GA7997@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:26:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET/RFC 0/2] perf: Fix issues reported by perf fuzzer
* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> hi,
> Vince reported several issues with perf code hit by perf fuzzer,
> in here:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141806390822670&w=2
>
> I run the fuzzer, but wasn't able to hit issues reported
> by Vince. But.. I was lucky enough to hit other 2 issues
> described in following patches ;-)
>
> As I dont follow the uncore code much, it is sort of RFC
> patchset. However I'm running the fuzzer now for several
> hours and can't hit any other issue.
The changes are looking good to me so I've applied them to
tip:perf/urgent to give them more testing.
If they break anything in the uncore code's expectations the
uncore people should chime in. In any case, stability comes
first.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists