linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: gpio_keys - replace timer and workqueue with delayed workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:09:26 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: gpio_keys - replace timer and workqueue with
 delayed workqueue

Hi Andy,

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:32:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 23:21 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > We do not need to roll our own implementation of delayed work now that we
> > have proper implementation of mod_delayed_work.
> > 
> > For interrupt-only driven buttons we retain the timer, but we rename
> > it to release_timer to better reflect its purpose.
> 
> At least it doesn't break the driver on Intel Medfield device.
> 
> Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Thank you for testing it. Assume it is for both patches, right?

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/