lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALHRZuotPpSoX9bnQin=93k0Hr7tEp_HZDaaBvfKaPfmoi_EBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:43:04 +0530
From:	sundeep subbaraya <sundeep.lkml@...il.com>
To:	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
Cc:	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: query on DWC3

Hi Felipe,

In DWC3 driver, for three stage Control OUT transfer there is a check:

   else if (!IS_ALIGNED(req->request.length, dep->endpoint.maxpacket)

             && (dep->number == 0)) {.
    }

I understand that we check for alignment of sizes and if not we
prepare trb with maxpacket and enable interrupt on short packet. In
databook I could not find anything related to this, it talks only
about addresses should be aligned. In Control transfer programming
model there is no difference between Control OUT or IN transfer, if
three stage transfer - prepare trb with length wLength. Initially I
followed this and not able to receive data on EP0 OUT.:( .After adding
the above check it is working. Please help me to understand why we do
this?

Thank in advance,
Sundeep.B.S.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ