[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548BE99E.2000409@ti.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:54:14 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Yunzhi Li <lyz@...k-chips.com>
CC: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<jwerner@...omium.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
Chris <zyw@...k-chips.com>, Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] phy: add a driver for the Rockchip SoC internal
USB2.0 PHY
hi,
On Saturday 13 December 2014 05:49 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Yunzhi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Yunzhi Li <lyz@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> This patch to add a generic PHY driver for ROCKCHIP usb PHYs,
>> currently this driver can support RK3288. The RK3288 SoC have
>> three independent USB PHY IPs which are all configured through a
>> set of registers located in the GRF (general register files)
>> module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunzhi Li <lyz@...k-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> - Accept Kishon's comments to use phandle args to find a phy
>> struct directly and get rid of using a custom of_xlate
>> function.
>
> I'm going to assume you didn't test this version, since it doesn't
> work for me. At suspend time power is high and my printouts in the
> powerup/powerdown code aren't called...
>
>
>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
>> + rk_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rk_phy), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rk_phy)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®_offset)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "missing reg property in node %s\n",
>> + child->name);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rk_phy->reg_offset = reg_offset;
>> + rk_phy->reg_base = grf;
>> +
>> + rk_phy->clk = of_clk_get_by_name(child, "phyclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk))
>> + rk_phy->clk = NULL;
>> +
>> + rk_phy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child, &ops);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->phy)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy);
>> + }
>> + phy_set_drvdata(rk_phy->phy, rk_phy);
>> + }
>> +
>> + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
>
> I think your bug is here. I think you now need to register 3 phy
> providers, not just one.
No there should be only one phy provider. It means the bug is elsewhere.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists